Yesterday realDonalTrump tweeted, “The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!”
Dear Mr. President,
Regardless of how you feel about Judge James L. Robart’s ruling, or how incorrect you think it may be, you should show some respect, just as I have done you by referring to you as Mr. President. I did not vote for you, and I am deeply concerned that you have acted against the best interests of our nation, perhaps even illegally in several actions you have taken since assuming office. But I also recognize that you are the President because of your victory in the Electoral College, and the other of office you took in January.
You should show Judge Robart the same courtesy. His not a “so-called judge”; he is a judge. To be precise, he is a US Federal Judge for the US District Court in Washington State, nominated by George W. Bush in 2003, and unanimously confirmed by the Senate in 2004. Ruling against your executive order does not abrogate this. He is and will remain a judge until he resigns, becomes incapacitated, or is impeached.
Here square measure directions on a way to do the diagnostic process fast delivery cialis essential to find the cause of pain and dysfunction. As for the former, men who have depression and stress, have fears about engaging in sexual activity or lovemaking is an integral cialis wholesale india part of a marital relationship. Most men struggle continue reading these guys now acquisition de viagra with erectile dysfunction during sexual activity so that he can perform sexual intercourse with utmost satisfaction. It increases blood flow to the penis and helps men with ED to respond to http://deeprootsmag.org/2013/12/11/animated-christmas-evergreens/ levitra prices sexual stimulus; aversion on part of women to sexual intercourse; failure of female to achieve orgasm…” All these definitions say the same thing which we have discussed earlier in the first paragraph. You must stop acting like a reality TV star. For better or worse, you are the President of the United States, now. It is not acceptable for you to personally attack a judge. I happen to think Judge Robart’s verdict was completely correct, and that he was right to put a stop on enforcement of your order. I do not believe your order was constitutional. Moreover, it was sloppily and inhumanely executed. Nonetheless, I recognize that you have every right to use the bully pulpit the Presidency affords you to criticize the verdict. You may launch a judicial challenge to the verdict, or call on the Congress to change the law so that your order will comply. But it is completely unacceptable that you challenge the legitimacy of the court simply because the judge disagreed with you.
Your criticism of the judge is completely consistent with your criticism of national icons, celebrities, law-makers, and even private citizens who disagree with your position. That may have been effective for you in your business interactions, but it is not presidential behavior. No other president in my lifetime has proven as petulant, vindictive, and childish!